Why do democrats want to continue to use wikipedia as their "source" for some information?

Author: admin  //  Category: wiki college

http://media.www.theeastcarolinian.com/media/storage/paper915/news/2007/03/21/Opinion/Wikipedia.A.Reliable.Source-2782972.shtml

Not even colleges allow Wiki in term papers. It isn't even reliable … so how come they continue to use it and say it is?

Exactly. lol. It's not creditable, therefore I don't even bother to click the link when a dem posts it.

I think its part of the whole "Lets hide the truth from everyone" mentality.

That, or the fact that not a single one of them realize that it isn't creditable.

Maybe they don't like the truth? Wha?!?! lol.

powered by Yahoo answers

12 Responses to “Why do democrats want to continue to use wikipedia as their "source" for some information?”

  1. ExCeL Says:

    Exactly. lol. It's not creditable, therefore I don't even bother to click the link when a dem posts it.

    I think its part of the whole "Lets hide the truth from everyone" mentality.

    That, or the fact that not a single one of them realize that it isn't creditable.

    Maybe they don't like the truth? Wha?!?! lol.
    References :

  2. Liberalism is for Sucks Says:

    Because huffingtonpost isn't always up and running.
    References :

  3. Chupate esa! Says:

    because conservapedia is a joke…
    References :

  4. aj Says:

    They are grasping at straws…
    References :

  5. bobbyrich32 Says:

    both sides use wiki…c'mon, wake up…are you and excel some sort of tag team yahoo answerers….seems that way
    References :

  6. Senor Magoo Says:

    Wikipedia is unvetted BS not to be trusted, especially not on political matters.

    Recall how Barry Obama locked his wiki page for editing, or shall we says Barry's partisan minions did.
    References :

  7. g Says:

    I see Republicans do it too…

    and actually, the links from wikipedia (usually at the bottom of every page) link to many solid sources…

    also, why do cons constantly post blogs as a "source" for their material? talk about unreliable… it makes Wiki look like the Oxford dictionary…
    References :

  8. HQ Says:

    What's even more hilarious is that some of the lefty loons actually cite Huffington as their information source.
    References :

  9. claudiacake Says:

    Lord in Heaven! I am soooo sick of hearing "source" this and "source" that.
    I wish people would just quit with the "sources". No one who disagrees with you is going to believe any source you post, anyway.
    What next? You have a problem with the encyclopedia, also, maybe?
    Sheesh!
    References :

  10. Justin Case Says:

    It's better than their usual sources: the Daily Kos and Moveon.org
    References :

  11. Universal Aardvark Says:

    Are you aware that studies show that Wikipedia is comparable in accuracy to the Encyclopedia Brittanica? And those who question the validity of the articles tend to be the least capable of actually distinguishing fact from fiction? Non-wikipedia links to claims 1 and 2 below!
    References :
    http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html
    http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2006/11/8296.ars

  12. tangerine Says:

    Actually, I've also seen conservatives use it. Nice try, though.
    References :

Leave a Reply